If there's one category that should matter most for a game like Dead Space it's the graphics. So which version is better? EA Redwood Shores has done an outstanding job of making sure the game looks and runs identically on both consoles. Dead Space is brought to life with an impressive lighting model, high-resolution textures, and a remarkably detailed character model for Isaac. The color palate is comparatively limited to the industrial grays and blacks of a futuristic space station, but the significant amount of environmental detail is always impressive.
The 360 and PS3 versions of the game are all but indistinguishable. There is a small difference in the ways each render color, but with Dead Space's flexible brightness customization, you should be able to get an equally impressive image with both versions. Dead Space doesn't always have the smoothest framerate. You'll notices some hitches if you make wide camera swings in new areas. There's also a bit of slowdown in some rooms with a lot of enemies. This happened in equal measure on both the 360 and PS3. Videophiles might have some issues with the slowdown, but I actually found it enhanced the play experience, exacerbating the sense of fear and helplessness. Finally, you'll get a terrifically detailed and atmospheric game on both consoles, neither is inherently better than the other.
Overall
1. Xbox 360 %26 PS3
Overall
EA Redwood Shores has done one of the best jobs I've seen of making sure their game runs equally well on the 360 and PS3. The game looks great, sounds great, and plays great on both platforms. Neither version is missing a crucial feature, and EA has outdone most other major third party publishers by including Trophy support in the PS3 version. The game runs identically on both platforms, and controls equally as well on either controller. You'll be able to save yourself a few seconds when loading a saved game on the PS3 version, but this isn't something you'd notice unless you were actively timing it. Ultimately, the PS3 and 360 version of the game will deliver an identically entertaining and atmospheric experience.END Nice to see the PS3 finally getting good versions of multi-plats. Which means there is no reason to own a 360 anymore ... okay okay, let's put the fanboyism aside.
That's good to hear. More developers should have the ps3 as lead platform and not the 360 when they're making multiplats.Deadspace PS3 vs 360 - IGN Insider Graph ...
So all in all a tie. Cows and lemmings are sure gonna be disappointed since they're not interested so much in sharing--no ownage anywhere.
This game is a must have for me. Far Cry 2 also... LBP... i love you but you will have to wait.
ps3 looks like a ps1 game
[QUOTE=''Awinagainov'']ps3 looks like a ps1 game[/QUOTE]Then 360 looks like the N64?
[QUOTE=''Sony-tha-champ0''][QUOTE=''Awinagainov'']ps3 looks like a ps1 game[/QUOTE]Then 360 looks like the N64? [/QUOTE]sarcasm roxxors
great. that's how all multiplats should be.
Ok... so, umm, we all love EA now, and Activision is satan? Hmm, I think I'm ok with that.
its funny, it looks like Issacs suit in the 360 and ps3 versions are slightly different. in the first shot the suit looks more realistic in the ps3 version, but more detailed in the 360 shot. Oh well, both versions look fantastic.
[QUOTE=''Awinagainov'']ps3 looks like a ps1 game[/QUOTE]what a fanboy! the PS1 could render far better textures than that!
Wow, the PS3 version looks awful compared to the 360 version. And the 360 version looks even worse.
[QUOTE=''thetruespin'']its funny, it looks like Issacs suit in the 360 and ps3 versions are slightly different. in the first shot the suit looks more realistic in the ps3 version, but more detailed in the 360 shot. Oh well, both versions look fantastic.[/QUOTE]The suits are different. There were supposed to be dlc suits for each version sorta like the Yoda Vader thing for SCIV. Hope thats why.
look the same
[QUOTE=''Floppy_Jim'']Wow, the PS3 version looks awful compared to the 360 version. And the 360 version looks even worse.[/QUOTE] lol Wut?
A PS3 multiplat that looks as good as the 360 counterpart, go cell.
m[QUOTE=''mbrockway''] [QUOTE=''thetruespin'']its funny, it looks like Issacs suit in the 360 and ps3 versions are slightly different. in the first shot the suit looks more realistic in the ps3 version, but more detailed in the 360 shot. Oh well, both versions look fantastic.[/QUOTE]The suits are different. There were supposed to be dlc suits for each version sorta like the Yoda Vader thing for SCIV. Hope thats why.[/QUOTE] It might be because they picked different suit modifications for the PS3 version and the 360 version.
[QUOTE=''Floppy_Jim'']Wow, the PS3 version looks awful compared to the 360 version. And the 360 version looks even worse.[/QUOTE] I agree. Im going to order the Atari 2600 version. Far superior. Only fanboys would disagree
If I'd had this info a few days earlier, I would have gotten the PS3 version, as I've been showing a lot of love to the 360 lately. Oh well. I guess the old PS3 will have to be satisfied with LBP.
[QUOTE=''Sony-tha-champ0''][QUOTE=''Awinagainov'']ps3 looks like a ps1 game[/QUOTE]Then 360 looks like the N64? [/QUOTE] you know the 64 was stronger right?
No comments:
Post a Comment